Hallo! Tracked shipping to Austria with Delivery Duty Paid for just €3.99  

Ship to
Austria
0
  • argentina
  • chile
  • colombia
  • españa
  • méxico
  • perú
  • estados unidos
  • internacional

Select your country

Americas

Europe

Rest of the world

portada Of Times Ontologically Insecure: Ontological Security Seeking and Types of Bilateral Migration Agreements
Type
Physical Book
Publisher
Language
English
Format
Paperback
ISBN13
9783658501211

Of Times Ontologically Insecure: Ontological Security Seeking and Types of Bilateral Migration Agreements

Lujic Tijana (Author) · Springer Vs · Paperback

Of Times Ontologically Insecure: Ontological Security Seeking and Types of Bilateral Migration Agreements - Lujic Tijana

Cheaper New Book Imported to Austria
Delivery: 26 Aug - 03 Sep Shipping: 13 to 17 business days.
115,28 €
Faster New Book Imported to Austria
Delivery: 14 Aug - 18 Aug Shipping: 5 to 6 business days.
155,26 €
Import costs and 10% VAT included in the price ✅
115,28 €

Synopsis "Of Times Ontologically Insecure: Ontological Security Seeking and Types of Bilateral Migration Agreements"

Why are bilateral migration agreements (BMAs) concluded the way they are? "Of Times Ontologically Insecure" combines the newest datasets on both bilateral labor agreements (BLAs) and other types of BMAs to get at the question in how far ontological security seeking behavior explains the conclusion of certain types of BMAs.Research to date has held that BMAs are signed to avoid costly domestic political debates and pass specific migration policies while avoiding institutional grid-lock. However, these accounts rarely take into consideration the variance in types of legal instruments concluded. Positing that the conclusion of BMAs cannot solely be explained by rational interest-based arguments, this study turns to Ontological Security Studies to analyze the cognitive underpinnings of immigration policy-making on the international level.The author analyzes how the interaction between domestic coalitions and the government in the United States led to the conclusion of specific types of BMAs with Cuba, Mexico and Guatemala at specific points in time between 1990 and 2020. Anxieties over a border in crisis and a highly polarized domestic public, have led the US to increasingly become ontologically insecure and thus, conclude informal agreements with externalized measures of border and immigration control.

Customers reviews

Frequently Asked Questions about the Book

All books in our catalog are Original.
The book is written in English.
The binding of this edition is Paperback.

Questions and Answers about the Book

Do you have a question about the book? Login to be able to add your own question.

Opinions about Bookdelivery

More customer reviews